Soupbone Collective

Disorderly, & marvelous, & ours: a potluck conversation

Phoebe Pan and Yeeseon Chae


hi yeeseon! how are you?

this is like an old timey gchat - i feel okie! not very spiritual today but i think thatā€™s an interesting place to start

yeah for sure ā€” was just thinking about how itā€™s Easter, and as a holiday, itā€™s supposed to be one of the most spiritual ones of the year, but all iā€™ve ever felt is really material on Easter?
maybe because iā€™m more accustomed to modern traditions of egg hunts and painted bunnies and elaborate potluck mealsā€¦

yea i do remember Easter mass - they go all out. iā€™m trying to remember if Easter mass is one of the ones where the priest throws the holy water at the crowds - that makes everyone go stupid crazy
but actually i did like the ritual. i usually like material things on holidays, but i do get what you mean about the material aspect being the only tie to a holiday or a supposed spiritual event

i think we talked about this before, how catholicism especially is so entrenched in ritual ā€” and not just any ritual, but rituals of performance, of spectacle, and how events like deacons swinging censers through the streets or parading down the abbey really just elevate the whole feeling of, ā€œthis is a thing to beholdā€
maybe thatā€™s all you need to experience something in a spiritual way, or to at least enter it ā€” you just need to behold it first?

photo by yeeseon, sent to phoebe on 1/6/21 with the following text: ā€œa dry cold and a wind that really wanted to bite my face but thankfully the sun was out šŸŒž i don't think this is new but it was the first time i saw this bunny garden deco! it's slightly freaky like all good garden sculptures should beā€
yea the priests know that people will look when they get water flicked in their eyes ! attention is holy and even though Catholic mass is kind of the same every time, the part where youā€™re supposed to hold the most attention is when the priest is preparing the body of the christ and itā€™s very quiet and everyone bows and looks up and the priest is holding the wafer and all you think about is that one abba pope meme1 because youā€™re sacrilegious

attention is holy! yes!
thereā€™s a mary oliver quote that goes, ā€œattention is the beginning of devotionā€... & i think jenny odell would have something to say about attention in that respect, or how attentionā€™s spiritual roots have been lost in translation amidst the reign of late capitalismĀ 
but yes, you talking about memes just reminded me of that galaxy brain one2 and how internet memes are supposed to be these really lowbrow cultural artifacts, but in fact are kind of spiritual?
especially in the way they circulate and make their way into peopleā€™s lives in the most unexpected corners ā€” one moment youā€™re scrolling through instagram and the next youā€™re facing some meme about high school that unlocks a once-forgotten memory about how you were secretly queer all along, and itā€™s like - holy shit! wow! revelation!

the question of the hour - are memes holy? maybe so,,,
but iā€™ve never thought about the way that it circulates and how that has to do with spirituality, i guess in the most basic sense, spirituality is something unspoken that you can share
hmm does it have to do with a prerequisite or a set of texts/memes/part of culture that youā€™re already familiar to? or i guess iā€™m trying to ask you how you define spirituality, and whether it has to do with something already existing, man-made or not
(wait can i open this bag o wafers)3

(yes please iā€™m hungry too)
ohh thatā€™s a great question! lately iā€™ve been thinking about spirituality in terms of silence - spirituality as shared silence
i like using silence as a commons because itā€™s a medium in which you become ā€” or, itā€™s a medium in which you can just be. for me, spirituality is everything that happens in silence - whether thatā€™s a parting glance, or tending to a plant, or holding someoneā€™s hand šŸŖ“
and it doesnā€™t have to be literal silence - there can be background noise, you know - but itā€™s more of an interior silence, a stillness, like the surface of a pond after the ripples settle

i like what youā€™re saying about interior silence!
i think that has to do with presence? or a feeling of known presence or felt presence even in silence
iā€™m trying to think of the ways that i define spirituality and so much of it still has to do with presence and especially connection, i donā€™t know if i would define literal silence into how i experience spiritual things because the moments when iā€™ve felt the most connected and then the most spiritual is when thereā€™s song or more like singing along
the experience i most equate with spirituality is collective effervescence but that might be going more into herd mentality, but also i donā€™t want to be an econ bro about spirituality!
i love feeling connected and crying at weddings for no reason except that when the priest or whoever officiates the wedding šŸ’’ the two are so firmly in it and they believe in it whole heartedly even if itā€™s just for that moment. it feels like a union: not about the marriage, but a union of intent and action, when intent seems almost more important and more powerful than the immediate, countable steps taken after
i donā€™t discount actions or anything but it does seem like there is something bigger in step with an action

photos by phoebe, sent to yeeseon on 1/15/21, with the following text: ā€œlast bits of california light. listened to some gillian welch and had to stop folding my clothes at these lyrics:"
"What will sustain us through the winter? / Where did last yearā€™s lessons go? / Walk me out into the rain and snow / I dream a highway back to you"
thatā€™s so true, about music - so perhaps itā€™s not really about silence, but about clarity? when everything falls away and only the necessary things remain
i love how you put it - ā€œa union of intent and actionā€ - and i almost wonder if presence has to do with the action of holding intent, or holding space for intent
which leads me to think about the internet, again, and digital spaces, and how so much of online interactions is about making intent clear... i mean, when you talk with folks online, whether friends or strangers, how do you reconcile the fact of them not being there, physically, with the fact of them very clearly communicating with you (via text, chat, audio, video, etc)?

ooh holding intent - i think that has a lot to do with what weā€™re trying to do. iā€™m not sure i reconcile with it very much - if anything it seems like i donā€™t feel that the other person is so separate
i feel like our internet and tech experiences have so much to do with (un)intended design elements, like thereā€™s not a felt added feature of they are there except for maybe the ā€œā€¦ā€ text bubbles before the full text to show theyā€™re writing
so much of interacting with people online is like i am sitting in my chair, looking at a screen, and the other person IS that screen?
i donā€™t think my brain instinctively knows the difference or maybe thinks of it as a part of only my experience. itā€™s hard to distinguish them sometimes,,, how do you reconcile that fact?Ā  šŸ§ 

i donā€™t think iā€™ve reconciled these things, either - but i spend a lot of time on the theory side of presence and absence, in derridean terms and all the way back to aristotle and plato4
& i think weā€™ve always been grappling with the presence/absence dilemma via text and mimesis - like, if i read a book, are the things that i read actually there? or are they just figments of imagination? can imagination have presence? and so on
take photography, too: barthes makes the case in camera lucida that a photograph is a type of absented presence, which holds subjective significance but not absolute truth. in other words, the photograph might be a copy or representation, but that doesnā€™t mean it canā€™t hold significanceā€¦ itā€™s not as simple as the binary of presence/absence = better/worse
for example, one interesting nuance about digital presence is that, for me, when iā€™m in a text chat with someone, i get into this zone. itā€™s like i donā€™t really register my surroundings or my physical sensations, i just fall into a very focused mental volleyball game between the other personā€™s thoughts and my own
and i think itā€™s because, deep down, things like digital chats are about collaboration, and collaboration demands presence in a very different way than other forms of presence. itā€™s as if i am less attuned with my own desires and thoughts, and more attuned with that in-between space - the possibility of what i can make with the other person/side, without physical boundaries to hold me back
sorry that was a big rambleā€¦ did that make any sense?

that makes sense! i think that zone is a part of this big question of spirituality, an in-between where ego is supposed to fall away but presence is demanded
is collaboration a part of spirituality for you / how does that fit in?

definitely!
even the most explicitly ā€œindividualā€ forms of spirituality (for example, reaching enlightenment, or meditating) are about collaborating or communingĀ  with something else, whether that be God, or your physical surroundings, or ā€œsource energyā€
i donā€™t think you can be spiritual without owing that spirituality to something else to aid you. growing up, i always thought that spirituality had to be something you reach/find on your own, but the more iā€™ve moved through the world, the more iā€™ve realized that yes, maybe you undertake that journey through interior means, but that doesnā€™t mean you do it alone

definitely yea,, what are some moments of spirituality that have been the most important 4 uuu?Ā 

well, every year when spring comes aroundā€¦ thatā€™s always a very spiritual event, regardless of what i believe in at the time
just seeing everything yawn and stretch and crack open is its own type of transcendence - a reminder that things have been alive this entire time, right under our noses!
but in terms of a specific momentā€¦Ā  i remember when i was around fourteen years old, at a music festival in germany. i was the youngest person, staying at a hostel with a bunch of other musicians well into their careers - and one night, after we performed at the local cloisters, we all went back to the hostel and started singing folk songs
i didnā€™t know any german so i just kind of mumbled along, drunk on that fervor - but i think that was the first time i felt a sort of clarity in what i wanted. i was a teen, on the cusp of realizing how big and disorienting the world was. i wanted to be able to share something with people, at the most basic level - to be able to connect with others, regardless of how much i had in common with them
yeahā€¦ that was a spiritual moment, for sure
& what about you? what are your moments of note?

iā€™m trying to remember specific moments, if i had a moment in church that felt closer to god or a higher being, but mostly theyā€™re feelings or very fleeting moments where it seems like i can feel energy all around? āš”
itā€™s hard to pinpoint because i donā€™t think i quite know what spirituality means to me yet, but it is closer to the feeling of energetic hearing ( i sound so new agey ) but just being very deeply

haha honestly, sometimes that new age stuff rings true
(though iā€™ve never been able to fully trust the weirdly cultish & authoritative vibe that new age teachings call ā€œself-helpā€, thatā€™s another thing to unpack: must we feel guilty in helping ourselves? the simplicity of new age stuff makes itself so enticing, like a mask: anyone can wear it... )
but yeah, i think ā€˜feeling energy all aroundā€™ is exactly it. trying to pinpoint a specific moment is like trying to catch an angelā€™s foot as theyā€™re taking off into the air, or like viewing the tip of an iceberg while knowing that the bulk of it rests beneath the water
that ā€œmomentā€ of spirituality is really just the small part that we can grasp, but it really is much larger and broader than that single moment

do you consider yourself a spiritual person? šŸŽ

to tell the truth, i donā€™t know if i consider myself a spiritual person. at least, i donā€™t actively practice spirituality
iā€™m lucky enough to stumble across moments of transcendence, but a part of that is because of the ecology of work and people that i surround myself with. then again, this question goes back to what it means to be spiritual - do i have to practice it, actively, to know it?
i donā€™t knowā€¦ what are some of the ways that you practice spirituality, or reach towards it?

i think the only way i know how right now is to observe, and i guess practicing means a lot of meditation, going back to the breath
i laughed at how new agey i sounded earlier but i think i mean it and also believe in most of it. i felt pretty disconnected from my christian upbringing and what did resonate were mostly the people, not the text or sanctity of the ritual
but i guess iā€™ve always had a natural curiosity and leaning towards otherworldly or spiritual reachings. it does seem like i believe that thereā€™s something always there

right, observing and practicing - not to psychoanalyze, but i wonder if the texts and rituals didnā€™t resonate as much because they were dictated?
i think observation and practice have to be done on your own terms in order for any type of understanding to emerge from the process
i mean, we just finished a little project called ordinary corner,5 where we took turns sharing photographs every day during march, & broadcasted them to friends through an email newsletter. even though it was through digital mediums (email, phone cameras), i think there was something very present about the work, because it was born out of our own will
for me at least, it demanded that i believe in both of us, to trust that we would be able to see this project through for the simple promise of completing it

right ! no i think youā€™re absolutely right - so much of the spiritual teaching that i received was dictated or expected to be repeated back
as much as i liked sunday school culture, in terms of learning about anything holistically with the texts that we got - not so much
i do think it has so much to do with observation, which is hard to do sometimes, especially in a city. a lot of our project that i enjoyed so much was about wandering outside, kind of loitering in a way, sometimes a little nervous that we might get looked at if we were taking a photo. but it really had to do with holding things that we saw, holding the places where we were, maybe holding ourselves a little bit too
looking at things can be a very active movement
i think we were trying to reach somewhere with being able to look at things, ordinary, normal life, very differently

yeeseon, 3/3/21
phoebe, 3/4/21
phoebe, 3/8/21
yeeseon, 3/9/21
phoebe, 3/12/21
yeeseon, 3/19/21
phoebe, 3/22/21
yeeseon, 3/23/21
yes, you put it beautifully! i loved being able to wander, especially with the anticipation of not knowing what my daily photo was going to be
i think it made me much more open to the world... it reminded me of the early days, when we were getting to know each other, weā€™d send daily photos from our evening walks or of the sky where we lived
i also love how you put it - ā€œholding things that we saw, holding the places that we were, maybe holding ourselves a little bit tooā€
all iā€™ve been trying to learn this past year is how to hold someone who is hundreds of miles away during a pandemic
& i find it extraordinary how weā€™ve transformed digital spaces from cold, sterile environments to warm, necessary abodes - as much as i am tired of zoom life and staring at a screen all day, i still think thereā€™s magic in the way people gather despite the medium
like, imagine the zoom waiting room as a type of existential limbo, with people gathering to be let in. thereā€™s so much potential energy and presence. or how folks are holding healing sessions and meditation guides over zoom - does it matter that those are not in person?
i guess iā€™m trying to ask: how has technology changed our experiences of spirituality? how have you held others when they remain so far away?

i donā€™t think thereā€™s ever going to be a replacement for being there, physically, with someone else, but since everyone had their whole year on Zoom and virtual spaces, there is more substance there
i think itā€™s the way people react to using it now, thereā€™s less resistance and more of a real burning need for company in any shape
i think people want to be heard as much as possible, maybe sometimes more than seen
i feel like the Zoom healing circles and events weā€™ve been to are all about that. the main event doesnā€™t seem hierarchical (or at least the events weā€™re going to), but the comments section really comes alive!
everyoneā€™s sharing about how theyā€™re in Texas or Singapore and how theyā€™re so happy to be there and really appreciative of the work being done on Zoom
i remember in-person events similar to those and thereā€™s not as many people saying thank youā€™s, or theyā€™re shy about it more because you have to walk up and tell them. that comments section really makes me happy in Zoom when they get to share ā€œuh-huhsā€ and ā€œwow i feel the sameā€ without being embarrassed but just heard. it still feels communal
for holding people when theyā€™re far away, iā€™m not sure iā€™m quite good at that yet
i tend to be bad about checking in with friends who have different routines, different zip codes now, but i want to be better about it
itā€™s hard, to find that common ground again, but holding people right now has so much to do with thinking about them, sometimes sending a text that i hope theyā€™re having a good day or something cheesy
i canā€™t believe my answer to ā€œhow have you held othersā€ is ā€œi just think about themā€¦ā€ i guess thatā€™s the first step ;)

itā€™s so true thoughā€¦ even just ā€˜thinking about themā€™ is an act of intent, right? so it is a specific type of holding, even if not complete
and what you said about the comments section at zoom events reminded me of how precarious our sense of ā€œspaceā€ is within digital realms
for example, when i sent out my ordinary corner dispatch every other day, i thought about the time between hitting the send button for the newsletter and the moment it arrived in someoneā€™s inbox (approx. 1 minute)
imagine all those emails going out to servers, touching all those seemingly invisible places before landing in a digital space ā€œof oneā€™s ownā€ šŸ’Œ
itā€™s crazy how we share so much in digital realms yet so little of that emerges on the surface
i guess itā€™s a bit like spiritual encounters, when you donā€™t realize how much you have in common with, say, a wild mushroom, until you start to think about fungi and decomposition and rebirth and the whole shebang unfolding over decades beyond your own lifespan, in circumstances unseen by you

i love the spaces in between!
itā€™s true, i wonder if people who know how to code feel a little bit tingly when they think about what the average person doesnā€™t know about each screen. all these hidden worldsā€¦
sort of related but how do you experienceĀ  time? was the project of taking a photo every other day different for you in how you experienced time?

ohh thatā€™s a good question
it definitely sped up my perception of time - i always felt like it was my turn too soon, or that before i knew it, i had to go out and take a photo
i think it was because that entire month, i had the project as a framework, and so the daily photos almost acted as strokes of hour on a clock, catching me off guard and reminding me that the day was at its end
cognitively, i donā€™t know what it is about attention that makes time pass by so quickly... something to do with the way my brain focuses and hones in on a subject
how about for you? did you experience time differently during the project?

photo by yeeseon, sent to phoebe on 1.18.21 with the following text: "today was a slow day. it was cloudy all day and then cleared up just before the sun set. the ice from a couple of days ago are still hugging the tree limbs and branches. i admire their resilience ā„ļø here is a little branch stretching out to boop the moon!ā€

it kind of slowed things down for me! ā³
the end of the day was like a deadline so my days felt much more clearer. i think it just goes to show that i actually like routine haha but more than that, it reminds me of how slowly time moves when youā€™re a kid and a 30 minute car ride feels like hours
especially taking a photo of my surroundings, in an effort to get an appropriate photo i paid more attention to when the sun set and what the weather would be like
it helped me begin and close my day šŸŒ…

oh thatā€™s interesting!
i guess that goes to show how we approach and experience work in different ways. but i totally resonate with enjoying routine and having that scaffold to begin and close the day
i wonder if that experience of time moving slowly has to do with waiting, and how waiting stretches the hours into a desert of interminable minutes
maybe spirituality is all about patience and learning how to observe time while moving through it, kind of like the way heraclitus describes time as a river that you step in, i.e. being aware of the mutable environment or essence through which you exist6
though, i wonder too: maybe during that waiting, weā€™re cultivating a sense of desire? maybe desire is what makes time feel slow?

ooh time does increase the yearning
wanting to sit with time makes it go by slower for me, especially in spring. sometimes, it feels like the day wants you to move slower or quicker depending on the speed of the wind
iā€™m not quite sure how want or desire fits into my spirituality, because they sometimes feel so opposite even when both are strong
the way i currently think about desire is more of material things, which feel so opposite from spirituality
i know when iā€™m wanting something based on a more shallow desire, versus needing something that is more whole? i donā€™t know though, i feel like a lot of people pray for things out of a need or a desire

mmm yes, there are so many teachings that say, ā€œyou have to relinquish your earthly desires in order to attain spiritual purity,ā€ blah blah
but we donā€™t give credit for how closely the material is bound to the immaterial! i just remembered this one passage from italo calvinoā€™s invisible cities, about a city where the inhabitants canā€™t decide if their gods live in a subterranean well or in the buckets that draw water from the wellā€¦ it seems oddly fitting as a metaphor. iā€™ll find the page and send it to you7
and youā€™re right, people do pray for things out of a need or desire. i really like the distinction you make between shallow desire and holistic desire
perhaps the former is always leading to the latter?
iā€™m thinking of the opening verse from bjorkā€™s ā€œpagan poetry,ā€ and it goes: ā€œpedaling through / the dark currents / i find / an accurate copy / a blueprint / of the pleasure / in meā€
i wonder if the way we desire things -Ā  you know, happiness, or love, or understanding - is also about being able to find the blueprint within ourselves
and i think spirituality helps uncover those interior maps, because connecting with others means knowing where your desire fits in relation to the rest of the worldā€™s. the hard part is trusting those blueprints, though. often, when i find myself desiring something, the last person i trust is myselfā€¦ anyway, iā€™m getting too introspective
have you ever desired something out of spirituality, or wanted it to lead you somewhere particular?

i think iā€™ve asked for it to give me meaning, leading me somewhere outside of my very human self
i think the part of spirituality that is most visible to me is the part where thereā€™s transcendence, not as a way of avoidance but as a way of connection
connecting so deeply with your surroundings and the people around you that you feel almost lifted or taken out of just yourselfā€¦
i think iā€™ve mostly asked for connection šŸ”—

i admire that answer a lot!
connection and meaning - they seem so simple when asked for, yet theyā€™re often so elusive
maybe we make it harder for ourselves without knowing
i still donā€™t have a very good answer to what my life means, or where itā€™s headed. but - not to fall back on cliche - i do believe that these things are connected, that spirituality rests with connection, and that connection brings meaning
so far, the most meaningful type of connection iā€™ve experienced has always come from friendship and love. though, you already know that
āœØ šŸ’•šŸŒ±
photo by phoebe, sent to yeeseon on 3/20/21, with the following text: ā€œwent for a late afternoon jog for the first time in a long time and found this burst of light along the docks - the past week has been shittier than usual but i am so grateful for the ways you have held me and i canā€™t say enough thanks <3ā€



Footnotes

We borrow our title from the last line of Ada LimĆ³nā€™s poem, ā€œWhat It Looks Like To Us and the Words We Use.ā€ Our avatars were customized in Stardew Valleyā€™s character creator.

1 ABBA pope meme
2 Galaxy brain meme
3 Referring to these biscuits, which we snacked on throughout the convo
4 Referring to Aristotleā€™s Poetics & Derridaā€™s trace theory
5 Ordinary Corner archive
6 Heraclitusā€™s theory of flux
7 Invisible Cities, p.20

Other references:

ā€”Mary Oliver, Upstream: Selected Essays, 2016.
ā€”Jenny Odell, How To Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy, 2019.
ā€”Roland Barthes, Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, 1980, tr. Richard Howard.
ā€”Bjƶrk, ā€œPagan Poetryā€ from Vespertine, 2001.

Additional things to check out:

ā€”ShÅ«saku Endō, Silence, 1966.
ā€”Christian Wiman, ā€œElsewhereā€
ā€”Apophatic / negative theology
ā€”Moomin wisdom on uncertainty
ā€”A New Nothing: image-based conversations

You can download a text-only PDF version of this convo below:

text-only PDF version!

Thank you Thalia, Clark, Damon, Katherine, Kevin, and Lauren for helpful feedback and comments! Thank you Katherine for sharing the codepen for the chat bubbles!



ā† retrace / contents / onward ā†’